How to configure your workstation for Lumion 2024

➤ Go to our recommended workstations

Lumion-3D architecture visualization software allows you to create calculations of 3D models in record time due to a special rendering technology. Lumion 3D visualization program has an innovative menu navigation (Pure-Class technology), which does not require long familiarization or training. Plugins are available for AutoCAD, Revit, Rhino, SketchUp, ArchiCAD and Autodesk 3ds Max. Do you want to work on larger and very complex projects with demanding geometry more easily and fluently? We configure the optimal business workstation for your individual Lumion application and offer you the possibility to put the system to the test with a test license for Lumion 2024 via remote access. Contact us and arrange a free remote test. Following our hardware expertise:

The optimal CPU configuration for Lumion 2024: Intel Core and Intel Xeon for different project sizes


To achieve optimal performance with Lumion, choosing the right CPU is crucial. In this guide, we look at the optimal CPU configurations from Intel, specifically Intel Core and Intel Xeon, for small, medium and complex projects.

Small projects
For smaller projects that typically involve simple 3D models and less complex scenes, a powerful but inexpensive CPU is sufficient.

  • Recommended CPU: Intel Core i5-13600K
  • Cores/Threads: 6/12
  • Clock frequency: 3.5 GHz (Base) to 4.9 GHz (Boost)
  • Cache: 12 MB
  • Power consumption: 125 W

The Intel Core i5-13600K offers an excellent balance between price and performance. It is able to render smaller projects in Lumion smoothly and efficiently without driving up the costs.

Medium projects
For medium projects that include more detailed models and more complex scenes, a more powerful CPU is needed to reduce rendering times and ensure a smooth user experience.

  • Recommended CPU: Intel Core i7-13700K
  • Cores/Threads: 8/16
  • Clock Speed: 3.6 GHz (Base) to 5.0 GHz (Boost)
  • Cache: 16 MB
  • Power Consumption: 125 W


The Intel Core i7-13700K is ideal for medium projects. With more cores and threads than the i5, it offers a significant performance boost that is beneficial when rendering more complex scenes.

Intel Xeon for professional applications

  • Recommended CPU: Intel Xeon W-2245
  • Cores/Threads: 8 cores / 16 threads
  • Clock frequency: Base frequency of 3.9 GHz, turbo frequency up to 4.7 GHz
  • Cache: 16.5 MB Intel Smart Cache
  • TDP: 155 W
  • Supported memory types: DDR4-2933 ECC


The Intel Xeon W-2245 is a powerful CPU that is ideal for medium-sized projects in Lumion 2024. Thanks to its robust architecture and impressive performance features, it offers the necessary computing power to efficiently handle demanding graphic renderings and complex 3D visualizations.

Complex projects
For large and highly complex projects that involve a large number of detailed models and extensive scenes, the highest available computing power is required. This is where Intel's high-end CPUs come into play.

  • Recommended CPU: Intel Core i9-13900K
  • Cores/Threads: 12/24
  • Clock frequency: 3.7 GHz (Base) to 5.2 GHz (Boost)
  • Cache: 24 MB
  • Power consumption: 125 W


The Intel Core i9-13900K is the pinnacle of Intel's consumer CPUs and offers immense computing power that makes it possible to efficiently handle even the most demanding projects in Lumion.


Intel Xeon for professional applications
For professional users who require the highest level of stability and reliability, especially during long and intensive rendering sessions, Intel Xeon processors can be an excellent alternative.

  • Recommended CPU: Intel Xeon W-2295
  • Cores/Threads: 18/36
  • Clock frequency: 3.0 GHz (Base) to 4.6 GHz (Boost)
  • Cache: 24.75 MB
  • Power consumption: 165 W

The Intel Xeon W-2295 is designed for workstations and offers exceptional performance and stability. With its high core count and support for ECC memory, it is ideal for large and complex projects where reliability and data integrity are critical.

  • Recommended CPU: Intel Xeon W7-2495X
  • Cores/Threads: 24/48
  • Clock frequency: 2.50 GHz (Base) to 4.80 GHz (Boost)
  • Cache: 45 MB
  • Power consumption: 225 W


The Intel Xeon W7-2495X is the ideal CPU for professional users who work with demanding 3D rendering programs such as Lumion 2024. With its 24 cores and 48 threads, the Xeon W7-2495X offers outstanding computing power, which is particularly important when working on complex projects and large-scale architectural visualizations. Thanks to its high number of cores and multi-threading capability, this processor enables efficient work with large data sets and smooth editing of scenes with high polygon counts. This results in significantly reduced rendering times, even at maximum quality settings in Lumion 2024. Another advantage of the Xeon W7-2495X is its high energy efficiency and reliability, which are essential for continuous operation in professional work environments. Supported by the Intel vPro platform, this CPU also offers security features and remote management tools that are important for professional users.

The optimal memory for Lumion 2024: Maximum performance for rendering and visualization


To configure an optimal enterprise workstation for Lumion 2024, it is crucial to choose the memory (RAM) carefully, as it plays a central role in performance, especially when processing visual effects and complex scenes. A comparison between DDR4 and DDR5 RAM in relation to small, medium and complex projects provides valuable insights to make the right decision.

Lumion 2024 overview and RAM requirements

Lumion 2024 is known for its ability to render highly detailed 3D visualizations in real time. RAM requirements vary depending on the project size:

  • Small projects: simple scenes with little geometry and few effects.
  • Medium projects: moderately complex scenes with multiple buildings, detailed landscaping and a variety of effects.
  • Complex projects: large and detailed scenes with extensive landscapes, many elements and intense effects.

DDR4 vs. DDR5 RAM: Technical differences


DDR4: Typically operates at a clock frequency of 2133 MHz to 3200 MHz and offers a bandwidth of up to 25.6 GB/s per channel. Latency times are comparatively higher, which means that data access takes a little longer.
DDR5: Offers a significantly higher clock frequency of 4800 MHz up to over 6000 MHz and a bandwidth of up to 51.2 GB/s per channel. Latency times are slightly higher than DDR4, but this is more than compensated for by the increased bandwidth and improved efficiency.


Comparison of performance for different project sizes


Small projects

  • DDR4: For small projects, DDR4 with 16-32 GB is sufficient. The performance is sufficient to render simple scenes smoothly, as the memory requirements are low.
  • DDR5: Here, DDR5 offers only a marginal advantage, especially in terms of future security. If the workstation is also used for other memory-intensive applications, DDR5 can already work noticeably faster with 16 GB.
  • Conclusion: DDR4 is sufficient for small projects, but DDR5 offers additional performance and better future prospects.

Medium projects

  • DDR4: 32-64 GB DDR4 is recommended for medium projects. Performance is acceptable, but very detailed scenes can experience delays, especially when multiple applications are running in parallel.
  • DDR5: This is where DDR5 shows its strengths. With 32-64 GB DDR5, the higher bandwidth is used to process data more quickly, which leads to smoother rendering and better multitasking capabilities.
  • Conclusion: DDR5 offers a noticeable increase in performance and better overall performance for medium projects compared to DDR4

Complex projects

  • DDR4: Even 64-128 GB DDR4 reaches its limits for complex projects. Loading times increase and rendering can become noticeably slower.
  • DDR5: 64-128 GB DDR5 offers a significant performance boost. The increased bandwidth and efficiency allow complex scenes to load and render faster, significantly increasing productivity.
  • Conclusion: For complex projects, DDR5 is the clear choice. Not only does it offer improved speed, but it also allows larger projects to be processed without significant delays.

The best graphics cards for Lumion 2024: Nvidia Quadro RTX vs. Nvidia Geforce RTX


When choosing the best GPU for Lumion 2024, two product lines from Nvidia are in focus: the Nvidia Quadro RTX series and the Nvidia Geforce RTX series. Depending on the type and complexity of the project, different graphics cards can be the optimal choice.


Small projects (simple scenes, few objects, basic materials)
For smaller projects that consist of simple scenes and use less demanding materials, the Nvidia Geforce RTX series offers excellent performance at an attractive price-performance ratio.

  • Nvidia Geforce RTX 4070 Super: This card offers sufficient performance for most smaller Lumion projects. With 12 GB of GDDR6 memory and the Ampere architecture, it can deliver smooth real-time rendering even at higher resolutions. It is also more cost-effective than the Quadro alternatives.
  • Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000: This card offers stable and reliable performance that is particularly useful for professional environments where a certified and optimized hardware and software combination is required. However, it is more expensive than the Geforce variant and often does not offer significant added value for smaller projects.
  • Recommendation: For small projects, the Nvidia Geforce RTX 4070 Super is the better choice due to its excellent price-performance ratio.


Medium projects (medium-sized scenes, more complex materials, multiple light sources)
Medium projects in Lumion 2024 require a more powerful graphics card that can handle both a larger number of objects and more complex materials and light sources.

  • Nvidia Quadro RTX 5000: This card offers comparable performance to the Geforce RTX 4080, but is specifically optimized for professional applications. With 16 GB of GDDR6 memory, ECC support and greater stability in workstation environments, it is particularly suitable for users who prefer certified hardware and work in areas where stability is a top priority.
  • Recommendation: For medium-sized projects, the Nvidia Geforce RTX 4080 is ideal as it offers the necessary performance at a better price. However, if stability and certification are crucial, the Quadro RTX 5000 can be a superior choice.

Complex projects (large projects, demanding animations, highly detailed scenes)
Complex projects require the highest available computing power to ensure smooth workflows and rendering times.

  • Nvidia Geforce RTX 4080: With 16 GB of GDDR6X memory and significantly more CUDA cores, this card offers excellent performance for medium-sized projects. It can efficiently render complex scenes with many light sources and detailed textures while remaining relatively inexpensive compared to the Quadro options.
  • Nvidia Quadro RTX 5000 ADA: With 32 GB of GDDR6 memory, ECC support, and a specialized architecture for professional applications, this card is designed for the highest reliability and stability in professional workstations. However, it is considerably more expensive than the Geforce RTX 4080, but offers optimized performance and certifications that can be important for specialized applications in the architecture and design industry.
  • Recommendation: For complex projects, the Nvidia Geforce RTX 4080 is the best choice as it offers unparalleled performance at a significantly lower price than the Quadro options. However, if the highest reliability and professional certifications are crucial, the Quadro RTX 5000 ADA is the superior choice.
  • Conclusion: The choice between Nvidia Quadro RTX and Nvidia Geforce RTX depends largely on the specific requirements and budget. While the Geforce RTX series offers excellent performance at a more affordable price and is more than sufficient for most Lumion projects, the Quadro RTX cards offer additional stability, certifications and optimized workstation performance that can be invaluable in professional environments.

Optimal Hard Drive Fueling for Lumion 2024: A Comparison Between Samsung M.2 SSD PCIe 3.0 and PCIe 4.0

To use the software to its full potential, it is crucial to choose an optimal hard drive that enables fast loading times and smooth workflows. Two popular options are the Samsung M.2 SSDs with PCIe 3.0 and PCIe 4.0 interfaces. Below we compare the performance of these two SSDs when working with small, medium and complex projects in Lumion 2024.

Small Projects

  • Project Size: Under 500 MB (small 3D models, simple scenes)
  • Performance Requirements: Low to moderate requirements for storage and loading speeds.
    Samsung M.2 SSD PCIe 3.0
  • Read/write speed: Typically around 3,500 MB/s or 3,200 MB/s.
  • Performance: For small projects, the PCIe 3.0 SSD offers more than enough speed. Loading times are short and working in Lumion is smooth and responsive.
    Samsung M.2 SSD PCIe 4.0
  • Read/write speed: Up to 7,000 MB/s or 5,000 MB/s.
  • Performance: Even though the PCIe 4.0 SSD is twice as fast as its PCIe 3.0 counterpart, the difference in performance is hardly noticeable for small projects. There are minimal improvements in loading times, but these are often not significant in practice.
    Conclusion for small projects:
  • A Samsung M.2 SSD with PCIe 3.0 already offers excellent performance here and is a very good choice in terms of price-performance. PCIe 4.0 would be faster, but the difference is not significant for small projects.

Medium projects

  • Project size: 500 MB to 2 GB (more complex scenes, multiple textures, lighting effects)
  • Performance requirements: Higher requirements for memory, loading and rendering speed.
    Samsung M.2 SSD PCIe 3.0
  • Performance: For medium projects, the PCIe 3.0 SSD shows solid performance. However,
  • loading times can increase slightly for very complex scenes, which can lead to a small delay.
    Samsung M.2 SSD PCIe 4.0
  • Performance: The PCIe 4.0 SSD can make better use of its higher speed. Loading times are significantly reduced and working in Lumion remains smooth even with more complex scenes. The speed advantage is clearly noticeable here.
    Conclusion for medium projects:
  • For medium projects, the PCIe 4.0 SSD offers noticeable advantages, especially when it comes to loading speed and working fluidity. However, the PCIe 3.0 SSD is still a solid choice, especially if you're on a tight budget.

Complex projects

  • Project size: Over 2 GB (detailed 3D models, extensive textures, complex light and shadow effects)
  • Performance requirements: Very high requirements for storage performance and data transfer rate.
    Samsung M.2 SSD PCIe 3.0
  • Performance: The PCIe 3.0 SSD reaches its limits with very complex projects. Long loading times and occasional delays when rendering can make work difficult.
    Samsung M.2 SSD PCIe 4.0
  • Performance: This is where the PCIe 4.0 SSD shows its full strength. Fast loading times and smooth performance ensure that even the most complex projects can be processed without any problems in Lumion 2024. The double speed compared to PCIe 3.0 is clearly noticeable here.
    Conclusion for complex projects:
  • For very large and complex projects, the PCIe 4.0 SSD is clearly the better choice. It enables efficient work without delays and offers the necessary speed to process large amounts of data quickly.

Our assessment

  • Price-performance ratio: For smaller projects, a PCIe 3.0 SSD is completely sufficient in most cases, as the speed advantage of PCIe 4.0 hardly applies here. However, those working with medium to large projects benefit greatly from the higher speed of the PCIe 4.0 SSD. Despite the higher price, it offers a future-proof solution for demanding work in Lumion 2024.
  • Future-proof: Since the requirements for storage and processing speed will continue to increase over time, investing in a PCIe 4.0 SSD makes sense in the long term, especially for professionals who regularly work with complex scenes.

Our internal performance comparison HP Z4 G4 ./. HP Z4 G5

An optimal workstation for using Lumion 2024, especially when working on small, medium and complex projects, requires careful selection of hardware to ensure smooth performance and fast rendering times. When comparing the HP Z4 G4 and HP Z4 G5, there are significant differences that can influence the decision for one of these workstations.


Performance and processor:
HP Z4 G4:

  • Equipped with older generation Intel Xeon W processors (Skylake-W).
  • Support for up to 18 cores.
  • Well suited for small to medium projects in Lumion where processor performance is not the limiting factor.
  • Bottlenecks can occur in complex projects, especially when working with large scenes and high rendering requirements.


HP Z4 G5:

  • Newer Cascade Lake or Ice Lake generation Intel Xeon W processors.
  • Support for more cores and threads, which improves multithreading performance.
  • Significantly more powerful for medium to complex projects, as the higher core count and clock speed reduce rendering times and provide better performance for large projects.
  • The higher VRAM capacity enables larger scenes to be loaded and rendered more efficiently, making the Z4 G5 a better choice for complex projects.


Memory and expandability:
HP Z4 G4:

  • Support for up to 256 GB DDR4 RAM.
  • Suitable for small to medium projects where memory requirements remain manageable.
  • For very large projects, however, the maximum RAM capacity can be limiting.


HP Z4 G5:

  • Support for up to 512 GB DDR5 RAM.
  • Enables significantly better performance for complex projects where a lot of memory is required for scene management and rendering.
  • The DDR5 technology also offers higher bandwidths, which further increases system performance.


Storage solutions:
HP Z4 G4:

  • Support for NVMe SSDs, which offer good read and write speeds.
  • Sufficient for smaller projects where loading times and file access are less critical.


HP Z4 G5:

  • Support for the latest PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSDs, which offer faster data transfer rates.
  • Ideal for medium to complex projects where fast storage solutions can significantly improve work speed.


Cooling and power supply:
HP Z4 G4:

  • Solid cooling and energy efficiency for standard workloads.
  • However, with intensive rendering processes in complex projects, the cooling could reach its limits.


HP Z4 G5:

  • Improved cooling solutions and higher energy efficiency that enable better performance in demanding workloads.
  • The better cooling is particularly beneficial for long rendering processes and complex scenes.

Our Conclusion:

  • For small projects, our HP Z4 G4s are a solid choice as they offer enough power to process them efficiently. For medium-sized projects, the Z4 G4 could still keep up, but the HP Z4 G5 offers significantly better performance, especially for tasks that require more CPU and GPU power. For complex projects, the HP Z4 G5 is clearly the better choice, as its modern hardware offers a faster and more stable working environment. If the budget allows and future projects tend to be larger and more complex, the HP Z4 G5 is the optimal workstation for Lumion 2024.

Recommendations for Lumion